<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Family Law Express Forum - Disputing Family Reports 	]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Family Law Express Forum - https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Unexplained Family Report and PA]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/Thread-Unexplained-Family-Report-and-PA</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 06:10:13 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/Thread-Unexplained-Family-Report-and-PA</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I would like advice on the best way forward with my case.<br />
<br />
My older kid (now adult) is totally alienated. While it was developing I wanted my older kid to see a psychologist about it but the ex refused, I took it to Court and the Family Report Writer (FRW) said there was no alienation and recommended against it, so it didn't happen and later the older kid became totally alienated.<br />
<br />
Now the FRW is recommending that I be prevented from taking my younger kid to a psychologist if I see alienation developing with my younger kid - no explanation given.<br />
The FRW acknowledges that my relationship with the older kid is destroyed but doesn't comment how, or how to protect the younger kid from the same thing, in fact seems to be recommending the same recipe that allowed the older kid to become alienated.<br />
<br />
I think I need an alienation expert to advise the Court (the FRW is a social worker).<br />
What is the best way to do this?<br />
- ask for a second family report (I hear this can be hard to get ordered, and time may be a problem)<br />
- have an expert (who hasn't interviewed anyone) appear as a witness at the trial to answer questions from both sides?<br />
- have an expert look over affidavits and write a report?<br />
- any other ideas?<br />
<br />
Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would like advice on the best way forward with my case.<br />
<br />
My older kid (now adult) is totally alienated. While it was developing I wanted my older kid to see a psychologist about it but the ex refused, I took it to Court and the Family Report Writer (FRW) said there was no alienation and recommended against it, so it didn't happen and later the older kid became totally alienated.<br />
<br />
Now the FRW is recommending that I be prevented from taking my younger kid to a psychologist if I see alienation developing with my younger kid - no explanation given.<br />
The FRW acknowledges that my relationship with the older kid is destroyed but doesn't comment how, or how to protect the younger kid from the same thing, in fact seems to be recommending the same recipe that allowed the older kid to become alienated.<br />
<br />
I think I need an alienation expert to advise the Court (the FRW is a social worker).<br />
What is the best way to do this?<br />
- ask for a second family report (I hear this can be hard to get ordered, and time may be a problem)<br />
- have an expert (who hasn't interviewed anyone) appear as a witness at the trial to answer questions from both sides?<br />
- have an expert look over affidavits and write a report?<br />
- any other ideas?<br />
<br />
Thanks]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apprehended bias]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/Thread-Apprehended-bias</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 02:14:58 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/Thread-Apprehended-bias</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Can apprehended bias (or something else) be used in order to change family reporter in circumstances where the family reporters first report was grossly and patently wrong, fooled by the acting of one parent and child deliberately attempting to deceive the court, missing the nasty psychological dynamics altogether (although clear and obvious evidence of the dynamics was not available at the time of the report, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">but is available now</span>)?<br />
A fully ethical reporter would admit they were totally wrong, but in circumstances where the reporters reputation is that they don't change their mind under cross-examination (ever?), it would be a risk to use the same reporter again.<br />
At a minimum they may be tempted to water down their assessment, as to make a full and proper assessment would be pointing out just how dangerously wrong (perhaps incompetent) they were in the first instance.<br />
Could this count for apprehended bias, or is there something else that can be used here to effect change of a family reporter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Can apprehended bias (or something else) be used in order to change family reporter in circumstances where the family reporters first report was grossly and patently wrong, fooled by the acting of one parent and child deliberately attempting to deceive the court, missing the nasty psychological dynamics altogether (although clear and obvious evidence of the dynamics was not available at the time of the report, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">but is available now</span>)?<br />
A fully ethical reporter would admit they were totally wrong, but in circumstances where the reporters reputation is that they don't change their mind under cross-examination (ever?), it would be a risk to use the same reporter again.<br />
At a minimum they may be tempted to water down their assessment, as to make a full and proper assessment would be pointing out just how dangerously wrong (perhaps incompetent) they were in the first instance.<br />
Could this count for apprehended bias, or is there something else that can be used here to effect change of a family reporter?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Second Opinion Report]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/Thread-Second-Opinion-Report</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:35:26 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/Thread-Second-Opinion-Report</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is there any way to get a second opinion before the courts when the family report seems to have bias?<br />
<br />
For any serious medical condition I wouldn't think twice about getting a 2nd or 3rd opinion, but are you limited to 1 with the family report?<br />
<br />
Any other options other than just critisizing it at the trial?<br />
<br />
It would seem to make sense to get another experts opinion before the Judge.<br />
<br />
Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is there any way to get a second opinion before the courts when the family report seems to have bias?<br />
<br />
For any serious medical condition I wouldn't think twice about getting a 2nd or 3rd opinion, but are you limited to 1 with the family report?<br />
<br />
Any other options other than just critisizing it at the trial?<br />
<br />
It would seem to make sense to get another experts opinion before the Judge.<br />
<br />
Thanks]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Report Writer bias]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/Thread-Report-Writer-bias</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:03:08 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://forum.familylawexpress.com.au/Thread-Report-Writer-bias</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I am just wondering how easy or hard it is to not just dispute the family report, but to somehow remove the psychologist from your case?<br />
<br />
Our psychologist, who is apparently preparing a family report, is a female who has made some negative comments to me, suggesting that she believes what my ex told her without seeking any proof.<br />
<br />
She has also seen my ex 4 times, twice without the kids, and I suspect that they have a friendship that is outside the professional situation.<br />
<br />
If I can prove this friendship, is it possible for me to get her discharged from the case?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am just wondering how easy or hard it is to not just dispute the family report, but to somehow remove the psychologist from your case?<br />
<br />
Our psychologist, who is apparently preparing a family report, is a female who has made some negative comments to me, suggesting that she believes what my ex told her without seeking any proof.<br />
<br />
She has also seen my ex 4 times, twice without the kids, and I suspect that they have a friendship that is outside the professional situation.<br />
<br />
If I can prove this friendship, is it possible for me to get her discharged from the case?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>